Please Help New English Review
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff

Thursday, 9 September 2010
General Petraeus' Warning Betrays His Own Misunderstanding

General Petraeus has warned that if Reverend Terry Jones burns a Qur'an, this will increase the danger to American troops. And it probably will, though not by a lot, since the Muslims of Afghanistan, as of Iraq, or those who take Islam to heart (that is, almost though not quite all) are deeply anti-American to begin with, which does not mean they won't use the Americans to fight their own enemies, or to inveigle money and weapons out of them.

What does General Petraeus, at this point, understand of Islam? He's a puzzlement, precisely because he gives the impression of being not unintelligent. So what's keeping him from recognizing the folly of American policy, American goals, in Iraq and now Afghanistan? Is it, as I suspect, that he cannot allow himself to come to understand that what he attempted to do was part of that folly, that it furthered that folly? Is he like those soldiers who, upon returning from Iraq, state that they support the war "because otherwise the whole thing will have been in vain, and my buddy's life will have been sacrified for nothing" and so on? Is it all at that level? 

Possibly.

Posted on 09/09/2010 12:45 PM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Comments
9 Sep 2010
Send an emailLugo

Liberal ideology keeps otherwise intelligent people from recoginizing the folly of a lot of policies. Why should foreign policy be any different?

It is not at the level of "otherwise it was all in vain". It is at the level of "if I contradict the prevailing wisdom in Washington, I will be stripped of my command and denied any further opportunities for power." Nobody above the level of Colonel is willing to admit our policies and goals are absurd and self-defeating. By definition, anyone who makes General has drunk the Kool Aid and has agreed to parrot the prevailing dogma of the political elite; otherwise they'd never have been promoted in the first place.



Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29    

RSS Site Feed
RSS Feed