|
|
Here are the Blogs in the The Law category.
Sunday, 7 February 2010
Is Everyone Born a Muslim?
 This article by ex-Muslim ali Sina is authoritative and informative.
It's the most ridiculous claim one could ever have made in history...
Dear Mr. Sina,
Muslims claim their religion is the oldest and only the truth and all human beings are born as Muslims but practice religion according to their upbringing. They claim people “revert” back to Islam and not convert to it. Could you please elaborate on this?
Muslims love lies. They live in perpetual self delusion. The claim that people are born Muslims and then indoctrinated into other faith is a ridiculous claim. If all children were born Muslim then one should see people who are not indoctrinated in any religion, would want to naturally believe in Islam. But this is not happening. In fact there is resistance and as the result Muslims try to sugarcoat Islam with 1001 lies to make it more palatable.
Also we are witnessing that even those who were indoctrinated in Islam leave it once they come to learn the unadulterated truth about it. The fallacy of this claim is self evident.
Islam is not a continuation of previous religions. Muhammad plagiarized heavily from the Old Testament, but the Islamic god and the biblical god are two very distinct deities, something that perhaps Muhammad himself did not know.
Originally, Muhammad tried to link himself to biblical prophets to bait the Jews and Christians of Arabia. He even used Jerusalem as his Qibla, but he presented no proof for his bogus claim and stopped talking so much about Biblical stories once he saw the so called people of Book do not buy his charade.
There is no mention of Muhammad in the Bible, except when Jesus warned his follower of false prophets. Jesus said you will recognize them by their fruits. Look at Muhammad’s fruits? Did he live a holy life? He was a despicable thug. He raided, raped and butchered innocent people and looted their belongings. This is enough for any sane person to know he was a false prophet. So why over a billion people think he was a prophet? The key word is “sane.” When it comes to beliefs people lose their sanity. They pride themselves in their foolishness and berate intelligence. Muslims leave their shoes and their brains outside the mosque.
Muslims say Islam is the natural religion. Imagine how preposterous this claim is. If it is natural why Muhammad established the institution of jihad? Why Islam should be spread by the sword? People would intuitively believe in a natural religion. Why force them? There is nothing natural in Islam. This faith is stupid and counterintuitive. Muhammad tricked people with the fear of hell and the promise of virgins, pearly boys (goodness gracious) and gardens with rivers of wine. The rituals of Islam are all unnatural. What these silly postures in prayer have to do with spirituality and worshipping? If these were natural people all over the world should know them intuitively, but they don’t and they have to be indoctrinated. Sex is natural. Getting hungry is natural. Getting angry under duress is natural. Believing in a higher power when you face a major problem is natural. But believing in the nonsense of Islam and its sadistic god of vengeance is not natural.
Fasting damages the health and makes one edgy. It is not natural and it does not make one spiritual. Muslims are most dangerous during the month of Ramadan. In this month they become beasts. These were the rituals of pagan Arabs whom Muhammad called ignorant, but copied their rites nonetheless. Now, thanks to Islam the practices of those ignorant people are practiced by Muslims all over the world.
Muslims claim Adam and all other prophets were Muslims. Where is the proof? The burden of proof is on them. Muslims confuse claim with evidence. They think Muhammad’s claim constitutes proof. This is the level of intelligence of these people who now want to dominate the world.
Islam has no relationship with Biblical religions. Unlike what Muslims think, Arabs worshiped Allah at least 2500 years before Muhammad. Muhammad’s father and many other Arabs were called Abdullah before Islam.
The Moon God
In the Ka’ba, there was a moon god called Hubal. This deity was the chief of all gods lodged in that pantheon. He was also referred to by his title al ilah (the god). Al lah is the short version of al ilah. In Arabic the definitive article joins the noun to form a single word allah. Allah is not a proper name. It is like calling the president of a country by his title, “the president”, but the president is not a proper name. Also in Arabic there is not capitalization of the proper name. Europeans capitalized the first letter of allah as it was already assumed to be a proper name.
There is no better evidence than the crescent placed over Muslim minarets that al ilah refers to Hubal the moon god of the Arabs.
Wikipedia says “Hubal was claimed to be a moon god, worshipped in Arabia, notably at Mecca before the arrival of Islam.”
Muslims deny that Hubal is the same Allah. If so, what is the meaning of the crescent in Islam? The evidence is overwhelming. Allah refers to Hubal. Hubal is the proper name of “the god”(al lah) that Muslims worship. ..
If allah was a proper name and the same as Yahweh, why there is no mention of Allah in the Old and the New Testaments? It is preposterous to say the Biblical prophets were Muslims and believed in al lah of the Arabs.
Many rituals of Islam such as the postures during salaat, fasting during the month of Ramadan, ablution, tayyammum and hajj with all its rituals from circumvallating counter clockwise seven times about the Ka'ba, kissing the Black Stone, running back and forth between the hills of Al-Safa and Al-Marwah, drinking from the Zamzam Well, going to the plains of Mount Arafat and Stoning of the Devil, are relics of the Pagan religion of the Arabs. The shaving of heads, the animal sacrifice and Eid al-Adha are also pagan rituals. These rituals were not practiced or taught by any of the Biblical prophets that according to Mohammedans were Muslims. If they were Muslims why they did not pray as Muslims do or perform any of the rituals that they perform? Didn’t Muhammad say that these rituals of the pillars of Islam? How is it that Biblical prophets, who according to Muhammad were Muslims never performed these rituals?
The story that Ka’aba was built by Abraham is a myth. Why that old man would travels hundreds of kilometers with a new born baby to abandon his wife and his child in the middle of desert? Furthermore, the Bible says that Ismail, Hagar’s son, was a young man abusing his much younger brother Issac in Canaan. How could that happen if he was left in Mecca? There are plenty of holes in the Islamic narrative.
Those who translated the Bible to Arabic used the word allah to denote God. If by this they meant nothing more than al ilah (the God) then it’s correct. Just as several persons can be called the president, gods can be called al lah. When the Bible mentions allah it is referring to al ilah Yahweh and when the Quran talks about allah, it is referring to al ilah Hubal. Allah is a title. It means ‘the god’. It can be any god.
The Bible mentions al lah of Arabs by his name. Hubal is the same Baal of the Moabites. It is the Arabic for the Hebrew HaBaal, "the Baal.”
Muhammad never mentioned Hubal by his name. That is because everyone called Hubal by his title. When the British say ‘the Queen’, they know whom they are talking about. Elizabeth and the Queen are not two different persons. Likewise, Hubal is name of al ilah Arabs were invoking.
Muslims have to look no further than the ubiquitous crescent to know whom they are worshipping. The crescent is the smoking gun.
I hope this answers your question.
Ali Sina
An understanding of this issue helps towards the realization that Islam is a replacement ideology to replace all other religions this to be by peaceful persuasion or force.
There is no way round this. This is the mission and this is the goal.
All the other stuff about violence in the Bible (Kitman is the name for that particular Islamic deception), the crusaders, the inquisition, imperilaism, colonialism, Bush, "the Jews," the This, the That and Ali The Other, is all nonsense, but nonsense which many, many people believe or are forced to "respect."
World conquest and world rule. That is it. Immutable it.
No Way Out.
Posted on 02/07/2010 6:58 PM by The Law
Sunday, 7 February 2010
The Auschwitz Album
The photos were taken at the end of May or beginning of June 1944, either by Ernst Hofmann or by Bernhard Walter, two SS men whose task was to take ID photos and fingerprints of the inmates (not of the Jews who were sent directly to the gas chambers). The photos show the arrival of Hungarian Jews from Carpatho-Ruthenia. Many of them came from the Berehovo Ghetto, which itself was a collecting point for Jews from several other small towns.
The photos in the album show the entire process except for the killing itself. Click here to view.
Posted on 02/07/2010 7:11 PM by The Law
Friday, 5 February 2010
"New opportunities for dialogue, mutual understanding and coexistence"
The Italian capital, Rome will open its first supermarket halal meat counter on Saturday, where Muslims will be able to buy meat slaughtered according to Islamic principles as well as other halal products.
Imams from mosques in Rome, Florence and Ravenna will attend the inauguration at the Ipercoop supermarket in the southern Casilina area of Rome, where traditional Arab dishes will also be served.
Muslim immigrants and converts can buy meat at halal butchers, but haven't been able to find it in supermarkets, and halal meat counters could help integrate Muslims in Italy, according to some.
"This is a chance to understand each other better and find new opportunities for dialogue, mutual understanding and coexistence - even inside a supermarket," the organisers of Saturday's event said in a statement posted to the Italian interfaith websiteildialogo.org.
What an opportunity - to dialogue and understand and coexist with no rights for kafirs* (Koran's term for rejecters and miscreants i.e. all who are guilty of not "accepting" Allah and Islam - I'm not kidding). See:
“Kafir” has been politically corrected to Non-Muslim
I'm not sure what the difficulty is in understanding that under "Islamic Shari'ah" kafirs have NO LEGAL RIGHTS.
Under the new laws of Europe, which are starting to incorporate elements of "Islamic Shari'ah," understanding and knowing that, and speaking out against it, makes one a potential criminal while the leaders, political, religious and communal, insist on endless dialogue to "understand" Islam.
The end product of this stupidity is submission to Islam.
That gradual submission, which Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch has named as Stealth Jihad, is in accelerating progress because part of "Islamic Shari'ah" is that it is a sacrilege** to be critical of any part of Allah's perfection and that includes "islamic Shari'ah" - what you might call closing the circle.
If the kafirs don't wake up and start to unseat the leaders and replace them with people who understand the difference between right and wrong, and halal and kosher or the right to just be, the future will be too terrible for words.
There is no sign of that - just more of the same.
Israel and "the Palestinians" and the PA, PLO, Hamas, and Hezbolallah and Islamic Jihad and "Al Qaida" and Al This, Al That and All The Other, are just red herrings.
Islam states its objective very clearly in its:
Wishing to contribute to the efforts of mankind to assert human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah
Some freedom Islam offers. Freedom to be unfree.
* "non-Muslims" is a PC'd term imposed on the unsuspecting public by deluded leaders, many of whom are crazed, addicted appeasers who are either bribed, ignorant, insane or stupid because they insist on looking for good when there is only a political movement to conquer and rule the world, and do all this with extreme violence and menace.
** Sacrilege:
BAT YE'OR
Thursday October 10, 2002
7:30 PM
Brown University C.V. Starr Foundation Lectureship
Salomon Hall Room 001
Excerpt
I call dhimmitude the comprehensive legal system established by the Muslim conquerors to rule the native non-Muslim populations subdued by jihad wars. It is my opinion that this system has not been fully investigated. However, one can rightly ask:
[…]
As a brief conclusion, I would say that there is no public debate yet on the ideology of jihad against the infidels, nor about dhimmitude, because these subjects are simply obfuscated or denied outright. Thus, Dr. Abdel-Mo’ti Bayoumi, the Secretary of the Islamic Center of the prestigious al-Azhar university in Cairo, recently wrote (Al-Musawwar – a mainstream Egyptian weekly, in Arabic - Aug. 23, 2002) in a rejoinder to an article of mine on Jihad (National Review Online, July 1, 2002), that the dar al-harb neverexisted, which implies then that neither jihad, nor slavery ever existed in Islam. Thus in one stroke of the pen, a reputable Islamic scholar summarily dismissed thirteen centuries of Islamic writings and laws on this subject.
Since the end of the 1960s some professors in Europe and North America teach that jihad wars produced no civilian victims, and that the Muslim armies of conquest were welcomed by their future dhimmis with open arms. This, of course, is the Muslim version of history and it is interesting to see that it is being adopted in Europe. This interpretation is in conformity with the shari’a which forbids any criticism of Islamic law or government, and attributes all evils to the mushrikun (the infidels), hence the necessity of the jihad, whose aim is to impose the Islamic law of justice over the land of Evil - the dar al-harb, the region of war.
Posted on 02/05/2010 8:12 AM by The Law
Friday, 22 January 2010
The Netherlands Is Submitting To Islam
It seems obvious that the Netherlands is submitting to Islam by having passed legislation to protect "religions" on the pretext of protecting believers from those who indulge in 'insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief,...." That legislation in Article 137c Dutch penal Code (See Note 1) is clearly aimed at protecting Islam.
The UN Is Submitting To Islam
The UN started submitting to Islam a long time ago - the Cairo Declaration is in fact a Proclamation of Jihad because it says nothing different than what Islam has been saying for 14 centuries - except it is all stated in comforting sounding, sophorific legalese.
So in the interests of what Mary Robinson, at that time of the UN, called "A greater need for an understanding of Islam..." the UN admitted the Cairo Declaration into its "Instruments" so affording acceptance and respectability effectively upon the right of Muslims to strive (jihad) with their wealth and their lives in Allah's path (Koran) - till all the world is ruled "in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah" because "God made" the "islamic ummah" the "best nation"(Cairo Declaration - parroting what Islam is all about).
Islam's Declaration on Human Rights
The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam
Adopted and Issued at the Nineteenth Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers in Cairo on 5 August 1990.
The Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference,
Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which God made the best nation that has given mankind a universal and well-balanced civilization in which harmony is established between this life and the hereafter and knowledge is combined with faith; and the role that this Ummah should play to guide a humanity confused by competing trends and ideologies and to provide solutions to the chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.
Wishing to contribute to the efforts of mankind to assert human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah
[…]
Article 24: All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.
Article 25: The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification to any of the articles of this Declaration.
So Islam Continues To Strive to Conquer and Rule The World with "Understanding" from the UN - Otherwise Believers Will Be Humiliated
So Islam can continue to strive with the UN's blessing to takeover and rule the world and strip "non-Muslims" of all legal rights and, if Allah so directs to the ruler of the day, plunder and steal property from "non-Muslims" because all the world is booty for the Islamic Ummah (see Islam and for instance Sura 9:29), all because this horror is Allah's will - and no one can criticise this because Islam's followers feelings will be hurt and the poor dears will be humiliated?
What About The Humiliation And Much, Much Worse of "Non-Muslims"?
What about the deliberate humbling and humiliation and persecution and murder and terror and rape and pillage of the victims of jihad, day in day out, year in year out, for fourteen hundred years?
Madness
What's going on in Holland is madness dressed up as sanity and Islam is being protected because the Sword of Islam demands that Islam be protected.
Geert Wilders Up Before A Semi-Shari'ah Court?
It appears that Geert Wilders is being hauled up before a Semi-Shari'ah Court of Semi-Islamic Shariah law in an Islamizing Netherlands, itself part of a rapidly Islamizing Eurabia, at present called the EU, otherwise known as Europe, on what seems to be the remote command of the World-Dictator-In-Waiting, the OIC.
It is that bad.
That is what we think.
We think that one day soon, the people of the Netherlands are going to pass extremely harsh judgement on those of their countrymen who are persecuting Geert Wilders, and that will include the judges if they convict him.
We think that the same kind of Tea Party Movement that unseated the Democrats in Massachusetts will turn against the hopeless government of the Netherlands except the Tea Party will not be so polite because the Islamization of the Netherlands and all of Europe has a growing number of people extremely concerned and upset.
Health Care is one thing. Terrorists another thing. An extreme left, it looks like, revolutionary government in the White House, is one thing.
But submission to the tender mercies of Islam is quite another.
If and when the people of Europe find out what their political leaders have done with their Political Correctness and their Crazed Multiculturalism and their willful disregard of what is after all the clearly stated law of Islam to conquer and rule the world, they are going to be very, very angry.
We believe they will find out.
Then what?
Geert Wilders is fighting for freedom, freedom for everybody.
Geert Wilders is a wonderful human being. He is our hero.
Note 1.
Is Geert Wilders in the Dock — or Is It the Dutch and What It Means To Be a People?
David Yerushalmi Esq.
[...]
The two Dutch criminal laws at issue are:
Article 137c Dutch Penal Code
1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or image, deliberately expresses himself in an way insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief, or their hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.
Article 137d Dutch Penal Code
1. He who publicly, verbally or in writing or in an image, incites hatred against or discrimination of people or violent behaviour against person or property of people because of their race, their religion or belief, their gender or hetero- or homosexual nature or their physical, mental, or intellectual disabilities, will be punished with a prison sentence of at the most one year or a fine of third category.
2. If the offence is committed by a person who makes it his profession or habit, or by two or more people in association, a prison sentence of at the most two years or a fine of fourth category will be imposed.
Posted on 01/22/2010 6:47 PM by The Law
Saturday, 9 January 2010
Nonsense from Thomas Friedman, David Frum and ("Alleged") Knickerbomber Abdulmutallab's Father
David Frum:
"The most daunting danger exposed by the underwear bombing is a danger that originates among Great Britain’s radicalized Muslims."
The danger isn't only from "radicalized Muslims," the danger is from Muslims, not because they've been born, no one can be held responsible to what religion they're born to, but because they are Muslims.
Islam itself represents the real danger, in the absence of a few (million) "extremist" Muslims getting hold of nuclear weapons or other WMD.
Islam's ideology since inception has been world conquest and rule of all "mankind .... in accordance with Islamic Shari'ah" (CDHRI*) which law affords us kafirs (Non-Muslims is a politically corrected term) no legal rights whatsoever. None, not even the right to life and no right to property.
I'll say it again:
No legal rights for kafirs under Islamic Shari'ah.
Why is no one saying this?
I'll say it again:
No legal rights for kafirs under Islamic Shari'ah.
The problem is Islam and the problem is being made worse by people like Frum, with his reputation as a neo-con for heaven's sake, either not getting it or not wanting to get it.
It is late in the day.
"In a column this week, The New York Times’ Tom Friedman imagines the thoughts of young Abdulmutallab’s father: “My family system, our village system, broke down. My own son fell under the influence of a jihadist version of Islam that I do not recognize and have reason to fear.” "
An article by Thomas Friedman in the Dallas News which mentions this can be read here:
Of course Thomas Friedman of the New York times doesn't get it either and if he or Abdulmutallab's father, or Frum for that matter could direct us kafirs to the texts of Islam that say that there is a version of Islam that Thomas Friedman imagines there is or that Abdulmutallab probably knows that there isn't, but would prefer to think, or hope, there is, that would be very helpful.
But in the unlikely event of one or all of them doing this, please, no quoting of the peaceful verses without mentioning the vicious verses, carefully and deviously crafted and then embedded into Shari'ah to define and justify the unjustifiable, that override and make the "peaceful" ones the nonsense they are.
If anyone is able to locate legal rights for kafirs under Islamic Shari'ah please let us all know - I mean "rights" which are not conceded by some benevolent Islamic ruler generously allowing kafir Jews and Christians the right to live with or without paying the jizya.
I have a book written in 1944 by Konrad Heiden, Der Fuehrer. The opening lines of the preface read:
"It is twenty-three years now since I first attended a National Socialist meeting, saw (without particular enjoyment) Herr Hitler at close range, and listened to the flood of nonsense -- or so it then seemed to me -- that he was spouting. It was only gradually that the effects of these speeches made me realise that behind all the nonsense there was unrivalled political cunning." -- Der Fuehrer by Konrad Heiden published in 1944, p. v Preface - opening lines.
Frum never got it as so many don't. Posted on 01/09/2010 2:15 PM by The Law
Friday, 8 January 2010
Jihad to Avoid Hellfire
Most Muslims think that if they pray five times daily, fast, give zakat and do haj, they will avoid hell. Not so fast. They miss the most important duty and requirement of being a Muslim, which is going to jihad and killing kafirs. -- FaithFreedom
Reality. Sorry.
So "Non-Muslims" (kafir in Koran) go to hell come what may.
Muslims go to hell unless they do jihad and get killed doing it and kill kafirs.
Muslims who don't do jihad and kill and are killed can avoid hell only perhaps, on Judgement Day.
The Koran and the Islamic texts don't deal with moderates or extremists so hell is an equal opportunity open to all equally.
Muslims have the choice and we see many choosing to avoid hell by doing jihad and killing (see the Ft. Hood massacre).
So Islam creates hell on earth for everyone and warns of hell in hell for most.
So if the "moderates" who so many fantasise over don't do the real thing:
1.They are in transgression of their explicit commandments and liable to be killed/criticised by the 'extremists'/'fundamentalists.';
And,
2.They will burn in hell.
Am I missing something?
No wonder "French sociologist Ernest Renan, the famed scholar, who, after dedicating himself to understanding Islamic scripture, wrote:
"Muslims were the first victims of Islam. Many times I have observed in my travels that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain others in the practice of this religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him.""
Quoted by Ibn Warraq as the first entry in Why I'm Not A Muslim.
Hell is Islamic Shari'ah law.
Posted on 01/08/2010 12:52 PM by The Law
Friday, 8 January 2010
Picture of the Week
Picture and caption from the Religion of Peace.com
The front door of Muhammad cartoonist Kurt Westergaard's home in Denmark after an assassination attempt by an axe-wielding Muslim.
Apparently the man who tried to hack the artist to death took
issue with the implication that Islam is not a peaceful religion.
Posted on 01/08/2010 7:20 PM by The Law
Tuesday, 5 January 2010
“Kafir” has been politically corrected to Non-Muslim
War is deceit, said the prophet of Islam, Mohammed.
The deception that started when Mohammed came down the mountain a la Moses and said he was the final biblical prophet of the one and only God, Allah, and that all mankind henceforth had to submit to this and follow his lead or else, and which has famously became institutionalised and legalised as precedent into the body and soul of Islam when Mohammed instructed his followers that deception to further the aims of Islam was not only permissible but obligatory, continues unabated.
Just look at the deception in Islam relating to the term “non-Muslims” and of course the kafirs fall for it, submit and oblige:
From an Islamic website:
(Al-Baqarah 2: 83)However, kafir is now a derogatory term, and that is why I would encourage Muslims to use the term "non-Muslims when referring to people of different faiths. This is based on the verse: (…Speak nicely to the people.)
According to that renowned Islamic scholar Yusuf Al-Qaradawi:
Question
As-Salamu `alaykum. Please enlighten me on the concept of kufr in Islam. What does kufr mean? Are we allowed to label anyone kafir without any justification? Are there various levels or forms of kufr? Jazakum Allah Kharian!
Answer
[…]
In juristic language, kufr signifies the rejection and denial of Allah, Glory be to Him, and His messages, according to the following Qur'anic verse: “Anyone who denies Allah, His angels, His books, His Apostles, and the Day of judgment has gone far, far astray.” (An-Nisaa’: 136)
Now look at the truth about how Islam views all people who do not believe in Mohammed as prophet:
KAFIR? The language of Islam is dualistic. As an example, there is never any reference to humanity as a unified whole. Instead there is a division into believer and kafir (unbeliever). Humanity is not seen as one body, but is divided into whether the person believes Mohammed is the prophet of Allah or not. ??
Kafir is what the Koran and Islam call the unbelievers. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.
The Koran defines the kafir and says that the kafir is:
Hated- 40:35 They who dispute the signs of Allah [kafirs] without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers. So Allah seals up every arrogant, disdainful heart. and despised by Allah.
Mocked- 83:34 On that day the faithful will mock the kafirs, while they sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the kafirs be paid back for what they did?
Punished- 25:77 Say to the kafirs: My Lord does not care for you or your prayers. You have rejected the truth, so sooner or later, a punishment will come.
Beheaded- 47:4 When you encounter the kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thor-oughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly.
Confused- 6:25 Some among them listen to you [Mohammed], but We have cast veils over their [kafirs] hearts and a heaviness to their ears so that they cannot understand our signs [the Koran].
Plotted against- 86:15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the kafirs and leave them alone for a while.
Terrorized- 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, "I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the kafirs' hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fin-gers!"
Annihilated- 6:45 So the kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds.
Killed- 4:91 If they do not keep away from you or offer you peace or withdraw their hostilities, then seize them and kill them wherever they are. We give you complete authority over them.
Crucified- 5:33 The only reward for those who war against Allah and His messengers and strive to com-mit mischief on the earth is that they will be slain or crucified, have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished from the land. This will be their disgrace in this world, and a great torment shall be theirs in the next except those who repent before you overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and merciful.
Made war on- 9:29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are humiliated.
[…]
Etc.!
But because kafir doesn’t suit the “marketplace of ideas” that Islam must operate in the modern era, its scholars and leaders, ever mindful of Islam’s central objective of world conquest, and the necessity of blinding the kafirs with the maze of detail, play the game of deception and soften the language for the kafir ear and so the kafir goes up a notch to “non-Muslim.”
Just like the black people in old South Africa were upgraded from kaffir (spelt with two f’s) to “non-European.”
The white Afrikaners would have had a blue fit had they known that they were also kafirs albeit with only one f.
"What a f…… liberty" the BBC's Catherine Tate’s character Nan would say if she only knew:
All the kafirs in the world should only know.
Maybe one day they will.
I believe the mass of kafirs out there know a lot more then the political, “community” and religious leaders, seem to think they know.
The multitudes don’t know the detail but they do know something is very wrong with Islam.
I think Hugh Fitzgerald is spot on when he writes that the public are losing trust in the leaders who are not truthful or don’t know and don’t find out the facts.
Posted on 01/05/2010 9:53 AM by The Law
Saturday, 26 December 2009
What"s In A Name?
NYPost:
A Dutch airline passenger told The Post how he leapt into action when an alleged Muslim terrorist tried to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner packed with 300 people just moments before landing.
Chaos erupted as alleged terrorist Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab, 23, tried to set off a sophisticated explosive device strapped to his body.
"Suddenly, we hear a bang. It sounded like a firecracker went off," said Jasper Schuringa, a film director who was traveling to the US to visit friends.
"When [it] went off, everybody panicked ... Then someone screamed, ‘Fire! Fire!’"
Schuringa, sitting in seat 20J, in the right-most section of the Airbus 330, looked to his left. "I saw smoke rising from a seat ... I didn’t hesitate. I just jumped," he said.
Schuringa dove over four passengers to reach Abdul Mutallab’s seat. The suspect had a blanket on his lap. "It was smoking and there were flames coming from beneath his legs."
"I searched on his body parts and he had his pants open. He had something strapped to his legs."
The unassuming hero ripped the flaming, molten object — which resembled a small, white shampoo bottle — off Abdul Mutallab’s left leg, near his crotch. He said he put out the fire with his bare hands.
Schuringa yelled for water, and members of the flight crew soon appeared with fire extinguishers. Then, he said, he hauled the suspect out of the seat.
"I took him in a choke to the first class and all the people were like, ‘What’s going on?!"
"I don’t feel like a hero," Schuringa told the Post as he recuperated with pals. "It was something that came completely natural ... It was something where I had to do something or it was too late.
Abdul is short for Abdullah which means "slave to Allah" in Arabic. Abdullah was the name of the prophet of Islam Mohammed's father.
Mutallab was the name of the prophet of Islam Mohammed's grandfather.
Hmmm...Just saying.
Posted on 12/26/2009 3:55 PM by The Law
Tuesday, 22 December 2009
Reverse Moses's
From Gates of Vienna:
The editor-in-chief of the Swiss magazine Weltwoche, Roger Köppel, has been indicted by Socialists in Zurich. The reason: he violated an anti-racism law. On talk shows, according to the Socialist thought-gestapo, Köppel “systematically denigrated and vilified members of the Islamic religion and thus crossed the borders of racism.”
The guardians of political correctness subsequently filed a criminal complaint with the Public Prosecutor in Zurich.
The Young Socialists (Jungsozialisten, Juso) in Canton Zurich have indicted the editor-in-chief of Weltwoche Roger Köppel due to violations of the anti-racism penalty statute. Köppel made racist statements in several articles and a television interview, the accusations asserts.
According to a statement of this on Thursday, it concerns the TV show “Talk Täglich” [Daily Talk] of the local broadcaster “Tele Züri” and comments in several editions of Weltwoche. Thus it was about the minaret-referendum and the Islam.
[…]
With such statements intentionally vague fears would be fueled, discrimination in Switzerland would be instigated, and the Muslims and Muslimas would be stigmatized. In their indictment, the Young Socialists want to send a signal against intolerance and exclusion.
To blame Roger Köppel for racism — who, unlike left-wing barkers, always knows how to behave and always argues with well-grounded reasoning — can hardly be surpassed in absurdity. In any case the leftists themselves inflame “vague fears” by trying to nip any criticism of Islam in the bud with the ultimate death-club of racism or fascism. Good for those people, who due to lack of arguments always show their undemocratic face and try to suffocate any opposing view.
- – - – - – - – -
Roger Köppel, editor and editor-in-chief of the Weltwoche, with numerous statements in the comments in the editions 43 and 47 of Weltwochehas made it clear that the people of the Islamic faith who live in Switzerland are a fundamental threat to security and order of the country due to their religion, from his perspective, and that one therefore would not need to be tolerant towards them. He ascribes to the Muslim women and Muslims in general an “unfulfilled nostalgia for the political coup”, because they “right up to today have not got over the loss of their empire.” The present Islam wants to be “a political domination system”, even a “political-religious ideology of conquest”, that is “hostile towards the current order” and seeks “extension, subversion and conquest.
In the above-mentioned television broadcast “Tele Züri” he made similar statements, and included the matching opinion that Muslim women and Muslim men living in Switzerland should be considered members of “a hostile army”.
With these statements Roger Köppel has clearly violated article 261bis of the Criminal Code, because he systematically denigrated and vilified the members of the Islamic religion.
Thereby Roger Köppel has exceeded the boundaries of racism. With such statements, deliberately vague fears are fueled, discrimination in Switzerland is instigated, and Muslims are stigmatized. This can and will not be accepted by the Young Socialists. With their indictment they want to give a signal against exclusion and intolerance, because for them it is clear: racism in Switzerland, no matter by whom and against whom, will not be tolerated.
Probably the lefties are just bad losers and can not forgive Roger Köppel for being on the side of the winners since the start of it. When they lose, democrats shows their true face…
The elites that Geert Wilders calls "sharia socialists" are swimming against the tide of the will of the people.
Anybody who is concerned for their freedom is a "racist."
Anybody who has studied "the religion of blood and war" (Winston Churchill) and who understands that it is primarily a political movement with an ideology of world rule and subjugation of all mankind, is an "Islamophobe."
The elites of any political persuasion who presume to lead but refuse to study what Islam is about, even "wilfully refuse," * are more than just fools. These people are being traitorous to their own people, their own countries. They are acting as agents of darkness and horror.
These elites are like reverse Moses's leading their people into slavery.
Many Swiss people have told us that the minaret vote was not really about minarets but is regarded in Switzerland as symbolic of widespread grave concern about Islam and about the Swiss people losing their identity and culture and freedom. We are told there is widespread discussion in many countries in Europe along the same lines.
The tide is turning. We hope.
*Hugh Fitzgerald
Posted on 12/22/2009 7:09 AM by The Law
Wednesday, 11 November 2009
Chief Rabbi Sacks on Islam
The Times:
The Chief Rabbi [in the UK] has called on Muslims to get used to living as a minority in Britain and to learn to separate religion from power.
Lord Sacks said that neither Muslims nor Christians had yet learnt the lessons inflicted on the Jewish people by the Babylonian exile.
“One of the great advantages of being Jewish is you know how to sing in the minor key,” he said. “We have had 26 centuries of experience ever since the Babylonian exile of living as a minority in the midst of a culture that does not share our views. Christianity and Islam have not had that experience.”
He said that Christianity had learnt toleration but only after 100 years of “knocking the hell out of each other all over Europe”.
He said: “So Christianity went through its experience, Judaism has been through it a long, long time ago and Islam has not yet had that experience.
“I have no doubt that Islam will work its way through to the essential situation that Judaism arrived at and Christianity, namely the substantive separation of religion from power. But there’s no quick way of getting there. It is quite a difficult and painful process within religion...
Dream on Chief - we are the ones who will have to learn to live as dhimmis. This will be due to the unrealistic dreams and denial of leaders such as the Chief Rabbi and their failure to face stark reality - Islam with its jihad and immutable Islamic Shar'ah - unless everybody wakes up. He goes on to say:
“Let me be blunt. Either we win or the fundamentalists win and that is the challenge. If the fundamentalists win, I wouldn’t hang around too long.”
[As regards Islam living as a minority see http://www.answering-islam.org/Terrorism/agenda.html The Islamic Agenda And Its Blueprints - it is a mystery to me as to why otherwise intelligent people don't read the writing on the wall and then base their leadership decisions on what is so plainly written and spoken and acted upon by Muslims and has been for close on 14 centuries.]
---"The Law" Posted on 11/11/2009 4:21 PM by The Law
Sunday, 8 November 2009
Winston Churchill versus The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
Winston Churchill in 1899:
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.
Book:
Pages:pages 248 50
Extract:"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property (either as a child, a wife, or a concubine) must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science (the science against which it had vainly struggled) the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."
The link to the Churchill Centre provided on the WMD site has changed to:
Winston Churchill had it figured in 1899.
Oh how wonderful it would be if he was around now. He read, he studied and he was wise.
Winston Churchill called Islam “the religion of blood and war.”
The most representative body of Islam in its 1400 year history, the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), says “Islam, the religion of peace, tolerance and compassion.”
Who would you believe?
It is very difficult for most people to understand how literally all the political leadership, religious leaders, teachers, academics and the media all repeat parrot fashion about how peaceful Islam is and that it has been "hijacked" by extremists such as bin Laden whereas it is the unfortunate reality that bin Laden is in fact an orthodox Muslim who is acting, precisely as he has been commanded by his Allah.
The people who are saying that Islam is "a religion of peace" are obviously doing so for a reason. There is no evidence at all that Islam is as they describe, on the contrary.
We believe that the reason that they do this is because they are suffering from Dhimmitude.
May we recommend that readers listen to our song Dhimmitude - the lyrics describe the sad fact of the mental condition of people who are hostage to Islam.
Dhimmitude is a condition of hostage.
After this little musical introduction to the subject we recommend a visit to the website of historian Bat Ye'or who coined the word dhimmitude to describe the sad, sad truth about the devastation that Islamic Shari'ah rule brings to Christians and Jews and non-Muslims generally.
Bat Ye’or is a world authority on the history of non-Muslims under Islam:
Under Islamic Shari'ah rule non-Muslims have no legal rights, not even the right to life and no rights to property.
Do any political or other leaders mention this unfortunate reality. No. Why?
Just imagine. No rule of law in terms of which all human beings are equal and no one above the law.
No. Replaced by Islamic Shari'ah where only male Muslims are equal before the law, Muslim woman have got dramatically reduced rights and non-Muslims none. Zip.
That is peace as far as Islam is concerned.
A world ruled by Muslims with all submitting to Allah's will and Allah's divine Shari'ah law.
The Law does not like Islamic Shari'ah law. It is the law of barbarism.
Posted on 11/08/2009 7:59 PM by The Law
Monday, 2 November 2009
The UN, Goldstone, and the Matter of Law
From Israel National News:
" "Meanwhile, the Sanhedrin – a Jerusalem-based organization of rabbis and Torah scholars seeking to renew the supreme Jewish court for the Jewish People in the form of a central Jewish-legal authoritative body – has issued an “injunction” to “prohibit the UN Security Council from discussing the Goldstone Report.”
A copy of the order has been sent to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, to the Rotating Chairman of the Security Council, and to Council members.
The Sanhedrin also calls for a revision of the UN Charter “and of the laws of war, with regard to the fight against terror organizations and terrorist states.” Avoiding this responsibility, the Sanhedrin states, “nullifies the legitimacy of the United Nations as a fair and representative organization that seeks to bring peace, and defeats the purpose for which it was established.” If a totally neutral investigative commission is not established, the Sanhedrin demands “steps to establish a new international framework to bring peace and resolve disputes, an organization that operates according to laws that reflect the vision of the prophets.”
[...]
“In taking such action, the UN has abandoned all basic standards of justice and freedom, and has turned the victim into the offender. By supporting the Goldstone Report, the UN has presumed to revoke the Torah law - which has become a basic tenet of natural international law – which states that if someone rises up to kill you, kill him first.” "
The problem that the "rabbis and Torah scholars" of the (new) Sanhedrin cannot bring themselves to address, is that "the prophets" that the rabbis like to think of as Jewish were Muslim according to Islam and "Prophet" Mohammed was the "seal of the prophets" and the Torah is false according to Allah and the only truth is the Koran. So with my lawyers hat on, with everything being equal in the Cowardly Foolish New World we are all part of, Muslims, in this case Hamas, have every right to kill kafirs, in this case Jews (Israelis, Zionists), because of their obligation to Islamize Israel (and the entire world).
The problem is everything is most certainly not equal in the real world. Muslims are superior and non-Muslims, as enemies of Allah, have no legal rights whatsoever.
The great historian Bat Ye’or, a world authority on the history of non-Muslims under Islam, and pioneer in the study of dhimmitude wrote:
Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradawi, spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, explained in a December 1997 interview that Islamic law classifies the People of the Book—Jews and Christians—in three categories: non-Muslim protégés, dhimmis, living in Islamic countries (dar al-islam); non-Muslims in countries of temporary truce; and non- Muslims in the lands of war, harbis.
Explaining that Islamic law establishes different rules for each of these categories,1 the sheikh summed up in a few words the theory of jihad that governs relations between Muslims and non-Muslims.
Jihad
According to the theory of jihad, inhabitants of the lands of war (dar al-harb) are infidels to be combated because they oppose the establishment of Islamic law in their countries. As enemies of Allah they have no rights: they themselves and their property become licit (mubah) for all Muslims. As the opportunity arises they can be taken as slaves, kidnapped for ransom, robbed or killed. War is waged against them to Islamize their territory which, according to the will of Allah, must belong to the Islamic community. If they resist, Islamic law provides for the deportation or massacre of the men and the enslavement of women and children.
So until and if that reality is dealt with by political and religious leaders things can only get worse until, to quote the rabbis in the Israel National News article "billions of human beings" will be killed.
To quote Bat Ye'or again:
"Present and Future : a Challenge
The twentieth century confronts Muslim leaders with a great challenge---whether to coninue their adherence to an ideology of jihad, which might eventually engulf the whole world in a gigantic nuclear jihad, or to strive for a profound renewal of hearts and minds, leading to the acceptance of the infidel as a fellow human being with his hopes and sufferings, who is everywhere the same."
[Page 137 of Bat Ye'or's first book, The Dhimmi, Jews and Christians under Islam, first published in 1980.]
No sign of Muslims not continuing "their adherence to an ideology of jihad".
On the contrary.
---"The Law" Posted on 11/02/2009 6:34 AM by "The Law"
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
Panorama-Migrants, Go Home!
The hype for this Panorama program is as follows:
Reporter Paul Kenyon continues his journey out of Africa following the route taken by 40,000 migrants a year seeking a better life in Europe. He discovers the way to the UK blocked by a new hardline policy in France to round up economic migrants and send them home, and an unlikely partnership with Libya's Colonel Gaddafi, who has reached an agreement with Italy to capture Europe-bound migrants at sea and lock them up in desert prisons.
But what about those fleeing war and persecution, and relying on Europe to protect them? Can it really justify handing them over to a military dictatorship outside the rule of international law?
Britain is relying on Gaddafi to help stop Muslim immigrants and so is Italy.
Well look what Gaddafi said in 2006 - see the MEMRI transcript.
"We have fifty million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe - without swords, without guns, without conquests. The fifty million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.
Allah mobilizes the Muslim nation of Turkey, and adds it to the European Union. That's another 50 million Muslims. There will be 100 million Muslims in Europe. Albania, which is a Muslim country, has already entered the EU. Bosnia, which is a Muslim country, has already entered the EU. 50 percent of its citizens are Muslims.
Europe is in a predicament, and so is America. They should agree to become Islamic in the course of time, or else declare war on the Muslims."
Gaddafi doesn't even have to try deceive because the political leaders in Britain and apparently everywhere apparently want to be deceived so they trust this blatant seeming nutter. But he's not nuts, he's just on a roll. He's winning.
---- The Law Posted on 10/14/2009 12:51 PM by The Law
Tuesday, 6 January 2009
Eurabian Nights
Tiberge at Brussels Journal writes:
Demonstrations that make the car burnings of New Year's Eve look like a school picnic have been taking place all over France.
According to Le Parisien, 21,000 persons demonstrated in Paris against the Israeli offensive in Gaza. A few hundred attempted to get into the Israeli Embassy but were stopped by police barricades around Place Saint-Augustin and Boulevard Haussmann. Many were wearing a kaffyeh and chanted slogans such as "We are all Palestinians, Israel: Assassin". "Gaza, Gaza, we are with you".
Some vandals threw chairs taken from cafés at the riot police, who, in turn, used tear gas. Some climbed on top of cars; public property was destroyed; two Israeli flags were burned; on Boulevard Haussmann three cars burned, about 15 others were turned upside down, then pillaged; storefronts were broken.
 A Swiss source, 20 Minutes, says that 20 persons were arrested. With the demonstrators from the start were Olivier Besancenot, leader of the LCR (Communist Revolutionary League), and Marie-George Buffet, leader of the French Communist Party.
 There were demonstrations in other French cities as well. Between 8,000 and 15,000 demonstrators in Lyons. About 15,000 in Marseilles, but the police say 4000. Between 2000 and 3000 in Bordeaux, 3000 in Lille, between 600 and 800 in Toulouse, 1000 in Annecy and Perpignan, 3000-5500 in Nice, 3800-5000 in Mulhouse, 1700-4000 in Nantes. You can check out the blog of François Desouche for lots of videos from the cities mentioned above.
When President Sarkozy returned to France on December 29, he delivered his traditional New Year's Eve speech, available on video at numerous sites, including YouTube.
The speech was remarkable for what it left out – just about everything of cultural and civilizational importance for France, focusing instead on economic issues. Sarkozy said that he told his people the truth from the beginning of the crisis, that he took his responsibilities and that he was demanding that all countries act in common agreement to make the necessary changes. He reiterated his belief in a strong activist Europe and his conviction that out of the current crisis a new world will emerge. He urged his people to remain in solidarity with each other, so that the most deprived could be helped. He spoke of his plans to reform the hospitals (recently a baby died when a nurse made a medical error), and the high-schools, to reduce the failure rate. He would make his reforms based on what he called the values that define France's specificity: work, effort, merit, laïcité, solidarity. "You can count on me," he told his people, adding that he would continue to work in Africa, Asia and the Middle East, where he would be traveling on Monday in an effort to promote the peace process, in accordance with France's mission to always seek peace.
Interestingly, he did not mention immigration, Islam, métissage, affirmative action, ethical issues such as gay marriage, terrorism, the crime rate, or the problem of a national identity being submerged in the massive immigration. These are the problems that beset concerned Frenchmen, i.e., those who confront, on a daily basis, the consequences of a bad social and immigration policy...
---The Law Posted on 01/06/2009 7:37 AM by The Law
Monday, 5 January 2009
"This is a culture of living, not a culture of death"
Reda Mansour on CNN 14.40 5 1 '09 - transcript of portion of the interview
Reda Mansour:
"You have to understand that the party that we are dealing with, Hamas right now, is holding the injured hostage, you know Egypt...."(interrupted)
Interviewer:
"But is there a crisis or not?"
Reda Mansour:
"But who are we talking here? When they say there are people killed or injured, when they say there is a humanitarian crisis, the level of this crisis can't be taken out of Hamas declarations. This is a totally propagandish attitude of Hamas. They will say anything they need to say in order to say in order to convince the international community that Israel is wrong. Let's look at Israel's.."(interrupted)
Interviewer:
"But, and I understand that Hamas has their own, their propaganda objective, Israel has it's propaganda agenda.
Why say there isn't a crisis when so obviously, if you look at the pictures, if you see people lying on the floors in hospitals, if you know that the best hospitals are now out of reach because militarily, Israeli troops have separated the Gaza out into three sections, why say there's no crisis?"
Reda Mansour:
"So that everybody understands there is no other country in the Middle East that cares about the citizens of the other side than Israel. Our hearts goes to the innocent civilians of Gaza. That's why we allow 80, 90 trucks a day to go in, even though its a risk to our military as well. I want to remind you that most of the people who work in the Gaza strip for the international organizations are Palestinians, some of them are Hamas operatives, so its a great risk, but we still enter 80, 90 trucks a day, diesel, anything we can while we are still fighting.
We have to manage both fronts. We have 10,000 soldiers, most of them are 18 years old, that we want also to take care of their security.. So we have to juggle the situation. We monitor it, we care about it, every citizen in Gaza who's killed is known in Israel.
We don't target citizens. We're not cynical about this.
For us this real, we care about it because we are a democratic country, we know the value of human life, this is a culture of living, not a culture of death."
----The Law Posted on 01/05/2009 11:02 AM by The Law
Saturday, 27 December 2008
Rushdie's Intellectual Breakthrough
"Ask yourself the question that if the Kashmir problem were resolve tomorrow, if Israel-Palestine reached a lasting peace, do we believe that al-Qaeda would disband? Do we believe that Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad would put their guns down and beat them into plough-shears and say we would now be farmers because our job is done. I mean the point about is that is laughable, right? And the point about that is that that is not their project. Their project is power. This is a power grab by the most obscurantist, revanchist, old-fashioned, medievalist idea of modern culture that attempts to drag the world back into the middle ages at the point of modern weaponry ..." -Salman Rushdie, in "'Brutality, Incompetence And Cynical Duplicity,'" Outlook India, December 19
The interview with Salman Rushdie is interesting.
He is romantic about "the sufistic Islam that is traditional in Kashmir."
I have always found Salman Rushdie to be somewhat unrealistic about Islam and he seems to have romantic notions about Sufis.
See what Andrew Bostom wrote about the Sufis, the big hope of such a politician as Michael Gove, who is the best, I think in Britain.
I remembered Rusdie did not have a good understanding as to the Israeli/jewish predicament in "Palestine" but now he seems to have figured that all non-Muslims, even "the Zionists" (otherwise little-known as a National Liberation Movement), are in the same predicament - everyone is up against jihad, "the jehad" Rushdie calls it, and the force behind "the jehad" is? Yes Islam (Mohammedanism, as Churchill and the others of a more learned age called it - and it hasn't changed - how can it?, its Allah's will - its just been PC'd).
That is progress - when intellectuals get it and say it! "Everybody is up against the jihad."
Posted on 12/27/2008 12:43 PM by The Law
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
RSS Site Feed
|
|
